Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
UtilitiesElectric, gas and water utilities and their associations, including rural electric cooperatives.Business › EnergyPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
96% of its money came through THE NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION America's Electric Cooperatives PAC, placed under Utilities. See where the money traces to
PAC (qualified)CorporationRidgeland, MississippiActive
Connected organization: Electric Cooperatives of Mississippi
FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00004952 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | $22,000 | $0 | $22,000 | 83% |
| Democratic | 1 | $4,500 | $0 | $4,500 | 17% |
| Shown support | 5 | $26,500 | $0 | $26,500 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 1 | $4.5K · 17% |
| Republican candidates | 4 | $22K · 83% |
| All recipients | 5 | $26.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | 5 | $26.5K |
Bars drawn to $7.5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA) · 8 payments | $80.6K |
$80.6K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · Connected to GUEST MAJORITY FUND · 3 payments | $7.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to KELLY JOINT FUNDRAISING COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $7K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to HYDE-SMITH VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $6.5K |
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Total reported receipts $75,205
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
3.3% to named individuals, 5% to organizations, 92% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 92% | $68,960 |
| Organization · 2.1% | $1,574 |
| Organization · 1.6% | $1,223 |
| Organization · 0.5% | $384 |
57 smaller sources, $3.1K in all (4.1%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $27,271
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $27,271
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 14 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
$27.3K spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $10.9K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 2 payments totaling $771.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Late 12G report, 2008$500 assessed
Case 1967 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Nov 8, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Electric Cooperatives of Mississippi Action Committee for Rural Electrification is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names Electric Cooperatives of Mississippi as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
| $4.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND · 1 payment | $1K |
$26.5K across 5 recipient committees, or 97% of everything this committee reports spending.
| Name |
|---|
| Amount |
|---|
| 3 payments · 28% of all spending | $7,500 |
| 2 payments · 26% of all spending | $7,000 |
| 3 payments · 24% of all spending | $6,500 |
| 3 payments · 17% of all spending | $4,500 |
| 1 payment · 3.7% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 2 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $771 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.