Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
IndustrialUnions of factory, mining, steel, auto and other industrial workers.Labor unionsPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACLabor organizationDetroit, MichiganActive
Connected organization: Int'l Union United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America UAW
Political fund of Int'l Union United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America UAW
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00002840 · files quarterly
5 priorities from the site of Int'l Union United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America UAW, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
We live in the richest country in the history of the world.
Yet, a small handful of billionaires own as much wealth as the bottom 50 percent of the globe.
The strongest tool we have to fight income inequality is the wage growth provided by a union contract.
Heading as listed on uaw.org ↗ (opens uaw.org at this heading)
Around 40 percent of Americans have some form of medical debt.
Every year, health care costs go up, while more people get sick or have to decide between seeing a doctor and putting food on the table, a roof over their heads, or sending their kids to school.
Meanwhile, we spend more and more of our bargaining time and leverage on just making sure we can keep our health care instead of winning better wages or working conditions.
Heading as listed on uaw.org ↗ (opens uaw.org at this heading)
“Too old to work, too young to die.”
That was Walter Reuther’s rallying cry in the years long battle to win pensions at the Big Three.
It captured the trap we are all put in after giving decades of our lives to these companies.
Instead of rewarding those years of service, more and more companies are ditching pension plans and leaving people to fend for themselves.
Heading as listed on uaw.org ↗ (opens uaw.org at this heading)
We work for a living not because we’re passionate about increasing shareholder value.
We do it for all sorts of reasons, from providing for our families, to being able to pursue our hobbies or interests outside the workplace.
No matter what keeps you going, everyone deserves a life off the job.
Nowadays, Americans are working longer hours for less pay.
Heading as listed on uaw.org ↗ (opens uaw.org at this heading)
As impressive as it is, the UAW’s success record at the bargaining table is only part of the story.
From our earliest days, the UAW has been a leader in the struggle to secure economic and social justice for all people.
The UAW has been actively involved in every civil rights legislative battle since the 1950s, including the campaigns to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1988 and legislation to prohibit discrimination against women, the elderly and people with disabilities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · uaw.org/about
Heading as listed on uaw.org/about ↗ (opens uaw.org/about at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 111 | $698.1K · 24% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 5 | $21K · 0.7% |
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $12K · 0.4% |
| Other PACs and committees | 27 | $2.2M · 75% |
| All recipients | 144 | $3M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 11 | $57.3K |
| Illinois | 9 | $55K |
| Florida | 9 | $55K |
| New York | 8 | $51.9K |
| Michigan | 8 | $51K |
| Ohio | 6 | $47.5K |
| Missouri | 6 | $45K |
| Iowa | 5 | $40K |
The largest 8 of 31 states.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 36,035 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.5M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $10,410,246
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
0.8% to named individuals, 3.3% to organizations, 96% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 96% | $9,978,479 |
| Organization · 3.3% | $347,404 |
50 smaller sources, $84.4K in all (0.8%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 12,927 contributions · 38% | $956,610 |
| 5,012 contributions · 18% | $459,473 |
| 4,294 contributions · 9.7% | $242,595 |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $8,765,397
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$8.8M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $3.2M, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
1978 cycleReport released Jun 18, 1981
Late YE report, 2021$14.3K assessed
Case 4283 at the FEC ↗Late Q1 report, 2020$11.9K assessed
Case 3830 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Nov 8, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
UAW - V - CAP 'int'l Union United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America UAW is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names Int'l Union United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America UAW as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
UAW - V - CAP 'int'l Union United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America UAW is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bars drawn to $800K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $600K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 2 payments | $200K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to OSBORN VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $200K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 3 payments | $75K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $50K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to WOMEN VOTE · 2 payments | $30K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $25K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to PRO-CHOICE MAJORITY 2024 · 1 payment | $20K |
| 1 payment | $15K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC WI STATE PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $12K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PADILLA · 2 payments | $10K |
$1.9M across 136 recipient committees, or 22% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 3,720 contributions · 9.7% |
| $241,330 |
| 3,109 contributions · 8.3% | $206,701 |
| 1,418 contributions · 4.1% | $101,564 |
| 606 contributions · 1.3% | $32,549 |
| 532 contributions · 1.2% | $31,022 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 13,802 contributions · 49% of ranked | $1,218,872 |
| 5,780 contributions · 20% of ranked | $493,164 |
| 2,746 contributions · 7.9% of ranked | $197,220 |
| 1,052 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $64,232 |
| 2,236 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $63,213 |
| 798 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $56,641 |
| 668 contributions · 2% of ranked | $50,929 |
| 261 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $34,375 |
A further $1,305 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($7,552,831) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 34,957 contributions · 97% of ranked | $2,416,982 |
| 267 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $35,100 |
| 558 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $23,188 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 185 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $20,697 |
| 33 contributions · <0.1% of ranked | $1,279 |
| 8 contributions · <0.1% of ranked | $675 |
| 6 contributions · <0.1% of ranked | $425 |
| 2 contributions · <0.1% of ranked | $400 |
A further $500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($7,552,831) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $5,194,199
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 367 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 9.1% of all spending | $800,000 |
| 1 payment · 6.8% of all spending | $600,000 |
| 1 payment · 5.7% of all spending | $500,000 |
| 10 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $240,068 |
| 5 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $214,386 |
| 2 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $200,000 |
| 1 payment · 2.3% of all spending | $200,000 |
| 17 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $196,855 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 65 payments totaling $859.3K.