Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00001305 · files monthly
“The Republican Party of Virginia seeks not only to elect Republicans but to provide support and guidance to their campaigns. We are comprised of a governing body called the State Central Committee and a Chairman who is elected by Virginian’s every 4 years.”
Republican Party of Virginia Inc, on its own site, virginia.gop
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
1 priority from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
That the free enterprise system is the most productive supplier of human needs and economic justice
That all individuals are entitled to equal rights, justice, and opportunities and should assume their responsibilities as citizens in a free society
That fiscal responsibility and budgetary restraints must be exercised at all levels of government
That peace is best preserved through a strong national defense
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · virginia.gop/our-party
Heading as listed on virginia.gop/our-party ↗ (opens virginia.gop/our-party at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 17 payments | $416.3K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 8 payments | $414.9K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 8 payments | $174.9K |
| House campaign committee · 4 payments | $68K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $45K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $28.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to CAO VICTORY FUND 2024 · 2 payments | $20K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $16K |
$1.2M from 16 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 8 payments | $161K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 2 payments | $28.9K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $10K |
$199.9K across 4 recipient committees, or 6.8% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 3 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,017 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $809.4K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 4 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $3,738,398
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
21% to named individuals, 1.8% to organizations, 75% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 53% | $1,974,719 |
| Organization · 0.6% | $22,524 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 12% | $455,921 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,797 contributions · 93% | $755,243 |
| 24 contributions · 1.3% | $10,490 |
| 42 contributions · 1.3% | $10,385 |
| 32 contributions · 0.9% | $7,377 |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $2,925,011
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$2.9M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $250.8K, December 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 1 payments totaling $3.8K.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
1996 cycleReport released Aug 10, 1999
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Nov 8, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Republican Party of Virginia Inc is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Its FEC record names Protect the House 2024 as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Republican Party of Virginia Inc is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $12K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to REPUBLICAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA INC · 1 payment | $12K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to GRIFFITH VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to ADVANCE THE MAJORITY VICTORY COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $5K |
| $44,029 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6.1% | $227,805 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $24,476 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $20,707 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.5% | $20,000 |
2552 smaller sources, $903.8K in all (24%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $2,900 |
| 8 contributions · 0.3% | $2,800 |
| 3 contributions · 0.3% | $2,070 |
| 8 contributions · 0.2% | $1,860 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 195 contributions · 14% of ranked | $58,041 |
| Written instead of an employer · 185 contributions · 11% of ranked | $44,180 |
| 5 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $11,535 |
| 19 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $11,103 |
| 1 contribution · 2.4% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.4% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.4% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 8 contributions · 2% of ranked | $8,328 |
A further $341,708 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($707,212) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 971 contributions · 45% of ranked | $347,159 |
| 48 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $40,922 |
| 73 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $34,456 |
| 27 contributions · 4% of ranked | $30,841 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 45 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $24,374 |
| 17 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $17,149 |
| 8 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $12,389 |
| 26 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $11,227 |
A further $11,888 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($707,212) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $892,134
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 186 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
7 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $52,661 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 19 payments · 5.7% of all spending | $166,515 |
| 8 payments · 5.5% of all spending | $161,000 |
| 10 payments · 3.8% of all spending | $110,611 |
| 10 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $67,502 |
| 8 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $66,213 |
| 16 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $52,647 |
| 1 payment · 1.4% of all spending | $39,793 |
| 21 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $35,276 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.