Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › Virginia U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, Virginia
Has not served in Congress
6 priorities from bertforsenate.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
"The national debt has more than tripled since Mark Warner took office. Back then he said he would lead the way to balancing the budget, but he's joined the Democratic leadership in Washington to enact a tax-and-spend agenda. In the Senate, I will focus on balancing the budget to protect future generations from financial ruin."
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bertforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on bertforsenate.com/issues ↗ (opens bertforsenate.com/issues at this heading)
"Mark Warner voted for higher taxes that would cost the average Virginia family more than $3,600 a year. In the Senate, I will lower the tax on selling your home, lower the tax burden on Virginia families, and help bring down the cost of living."
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bertforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on bertforsenate.com/issues ↗ (opens bertforsenate.com/issues at this heading)
"As a four-time combat veteran with 41 years in uniform, I understand the difficult issues facing veterans, their families and survivors. I will protect veterans' benefits, expand access to quality healthcare, and ensure veterans aren't stuck waiting on Washington for the care they earned."
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bertforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on bertforsenate.com/issues ↗ (opens bertforsenate.com/issues at this heading)
"For too long, members of Congress have gotten rich while the people they represent fall further behind. As Senator, I will ban congressional stock trading, so politicians put their constituents first, not themselves."
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bertforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on bertforsenate.com/issues ↗ (opens bertforsenate.com/issues at this heading)
"In Washington, I will lower healthcare costs for Virginians. That starts with holding insurance companies accountable and funding for rural hospitals, funding that Mark Warner refused to support."
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bertforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on bertforsenate.com/issues ↗ (opens bertforsenate.com/issues at this heading)
"Nuclear power is clean, cheap, reliable and safe. Today's nuclear technology is, as they say, not your father's technology. I support bringing new nuclear power on-line to slash the ever-increasing energy costs for American households."
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bertforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on bertforsenate.com/issues ↗ (opens bertforsenate.com/issues at this heading)
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00934265
86¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($944.7K of $1.1M). Cash on hand went from $55.4K on Mar 31, 2026 to $152.4K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $192,041 | $136,636 | $55,405 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $149,178 | $153,163 | $51,419 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $34,994 | $33,449 | $52,964 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $614,321 | $439,423 | $227,862 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $106,586 | $182,055 | $152,394 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 122,335 votes (51%) · 1 of 3 · Full results ↗
Lost · 1,383,624 votes (38%) · 2 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,643 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $498.2K.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 1 transfer was filed this cycle, totaling $32K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $1,141,130
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
80% of the money placed by state came from inside Virginia: $399.9K of $498.2K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,292 contributions · 80% | $399,905 |
| 49 contributions · 6.1% | $30,142 |
| 2 contributions · 2.8% | $14,000 |
| 69 contributions · 2.4% | $12,020 |
| 6 contributions · 1.5% | $7,394 |
| 18 contributions · 1.4% | $6,993 |
| 54 contributions · 1.3% | $6,699 |
| 4 contributions · 0.9% | $4,510 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 30 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,168 contributions · 64% of ranked | $278,527 |
| Written instead of an employer · 55 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $17,940 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1% of ranked | $4,500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.8% of ranked | $3,644 |
| 1 contribution · 0.8% of ranked | $3,643 |
A further $60,071 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($418,614) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Mizusawa’s campaign or spending on ads about Mizusawa are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 6% to named individuals, 91% to organizations, 2.8% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · behind Fellowship PAC | $132.7K |
| Organization · behind Fellowship PAC | $13.3K |
| Person · Retired · behind Democratic Messaging Project | $7.4K |
Read for the 4 largest groups of 5, 81% of the $197.7K spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $5,839 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $928,063
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 687 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
156 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $148,980 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 220 payments · 15% of all spending | $147,811 |
| 12 payments · 14% of all spending | $134,271 |
| 9 payments · 11% of all spending | $104,614 |
| 8 payments · 5.8% of all spending | $57,463 |
| 10 payments · 5% of all spending | $49,070 |
| 13 payments · 4.5% of all spending | $43,982 |
| 2 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $41,987 |
| 9 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $35,914 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,153 contributions · 61% of ranked | $274,385 |
| 12 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $9,704 |
| 5 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $9,500 |
| 18 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $9,418 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 3 contributions · 2% of ranked | $9,000 |
| 17 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $7,817 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $48,013 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($418,614) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.