Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › New Mexico U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, New Mexico
Has not served in Congress
3 priorities from larrymarker.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Protecting our jobs, our schools, and our energy independence
New Mexico should not be forced to choose between a thriving economy and a secure future. Larry Marker’s all-of-the-above strategy starts by defending the industry that funds classrooms and anchors rural communities.
- Stop federal overreach and permitting paralysis.
- Protect the education funding families rely on.
- Make New Mexico a leader in oil, gas, hydrogen, and nuclear innovation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · larrymarker.com
Heading as listed on larrymarker.com ↗ (opens larrymarker.com at this heading)
Protecting New Mexico families from fentanyl and violent crime
The first duty of government is to keep its citizens safe. For too long, New Mexico’s border has been a gateway for criminal cartels, human traffickers, and a flood of lethal fentanyl that is devastating our families and claiming the lives of our children. While progress has been made to secure our southern border, our work is far from over.
- Shut down the fentanyl pipeline.
- Support Border Patrol and local law enforcement.
- Oppose policies that shield violent offenders.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · larrymarker.com
Heading as listed on larrymarker.com ↗ (opens larrymarker.com at this heading)
Stopping lawfare and agency abuse against New Mexico agriculture
New Mexico agriculture is a foundation of rural life, food production, and land stewardship. Larry Marker’s message is that farmers and livestock producers should not be crushed by unelected agencies using regulation, delay, and selective enforcement as weapons.
- Stop regulatory abuse against farmers and livestock producers.
- Defend grazing rights, water access, and working land.
- Push back on law fare from unaccountable agencies.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · larrymarker.com
Heading as listed on larrymarker.com ↗ (opens larrymarker.com at this heading)
FEC filings, Apr 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00943738
91¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 4 reports ($90.1K of $99.2K). Cash on hand went from $2.8K on May 13, 2026 to $88 on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $15,625 | $12,794 | $2,831 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $17,900 | $8,881 | $11,850 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $58,486 | $59,375 | $1,942 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $7,219 | $9,072 | $88 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 31,160 votes (100%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Lost · 266,434 votes (37%) · 2 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Ben Ray Luján leads Larry Marker by 17 pointsAverage of the 4 latest nonpartisan polls
Latest poll · Research Co., Nov 2, 2026
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 93 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $86K.
Total reported receipts $99,230
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
99% of the money placed by state came from inside New Mexico: $85K of $86K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 91 contributions · 99% | $84,959 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% | $500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% | $500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 3 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 31 contributions · 53% of ranked | $37,498 |
| Written instead of an employer · 43 contributions · 35% of ranked | $25,067 |
| 1 contribution · 3.5% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.8% of ranked | $2,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.8% of ranked | $2,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.8% of ranked | $2,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.4% of ranked | $250 |
| 1 contribution · 0.1% of ranked | $104 |
A further $14,540 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($7,918) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 48 contributions · 39% of ranked | $31,567 |
| 4 contributions · 16% of ranked | $13,100 |
| 2 contributions · 5.6% of ranked | $4,500 |
| 4 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $4,250 |
| 2 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $4,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.3% of ranked | $3,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 3.8% of ranked | $3,100 |
| 1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked | $2,500 |
A further $4,940 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($7,918) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Marker’s campaign or spending on ads about Marker are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 16% to named individuals, 31% to organizations, 37% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 0.7% to committees nothing more could be followed from, 15% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind AB PAC | $45.5K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind AB PAC | $34.1K |
| Organization · behind AB PAC | $30.4K |
| Organization · behind AB PAC | $18.3K |
| Organization · behind Workers EN Accion PAC | $12.3K |
| Person · Retired · behind AB PAC | $12.2K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind AB PAC | $8.4K |
| Organization · behind AB PAC | $4.9K |
| Organization · behind Workers EN Accion PAC | $4.8K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind AB PAC | $4.7K |
| Organization · behind Workers EN Accion PAC | $2.9K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Workers EN Accion PAC | $2.7K |
Read for the 4 largest groups of 5, 99.6% of the $264.8K spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $82,541
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 298 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 16% of all spending | $14,063 |
| 14 payments · 13% of all spending | $11,647 |
| 4 payments · 8.7% of all spending | $7,800 |
| 11 payments · 6.3% of all spending | $5,719 |
| 2 payments · 5.6% of all spending | $5,005 |
| 157 payments · 4.5% of all spending | $4,067 |
| 1 payment · 4% of all spending | $3,577 |
| 3 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $3,037 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.