Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › Nebraska U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
O Nominee for U.S. Senate, Nebraska
Has not served in Congress
No campaign site or public profiles are attached to this record yet.
Chuck Conboy’s words are not shown
FEC filings, Oct 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00962845
Total reported receipts $0
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the committees giving to Conboy’s campaign or spending on ads about Conboy are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 26% to named individuals, 43% to organizations, 26% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 0.8% to committees nothing more could be followed from, 4.2% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · CEO, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. · behind SLF PAC and Cornhusker Majority | $5M |
| Organization · behind Defend American Jobs | $4.6M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Nebraska Values PAC and Working Class Majority PAC, Inc and 1 more | $4.5M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind SLF PAC and Cornhusker Majority | $4M |
| Organization · behind Working Class Majority PAC, Inc and United Futures PAC | $3.7M |
| Organization · behind Nebraska Values PAC and Working Class Majority PAC, Inc and 1 more | $2.8M |
| Organization · behind The Edge Action Fund and Nebraska Values PAC and 2 more | $2.7M |
| Organization · behind Defend American Jobs | $2.6M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Nebraska Values PAC and Working Class Majority PAC, Inc and 2 more | $2.5M |
| Organization · behind Defend American Jobs | $2.4M |
| Person · Attorney, Pajcic & Pajcic · behind Freedom From Politics, Inc. | $2M |
| Organization · behind Nebraska Values PAC and Working Class Majority PAC, Inc and 1 more | $2M |
Read for the 18 largest groups of 50, 97% of the $71.8M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
No itemized payments
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026
Not read yet
Lost · 9,094 votes (1.2%) · 5 of 5 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Election November 3, 2026 · 7 polls of this matchup
Pete Ricketts leads Dan Osborn by 1.9 points · average gap, 5 latest nonpartisan polls
Each dot is a poll. The line is the median of the 5 latest nonpartisan polls. How polls are read
Pete Ricketts won by 6.2 points. The 4 final polls had a median of Pete Ricketts +2.5, understating Pete Ricketts's margin by 3.7 points.
| Poll | Pete Ricketts | Dan Osborn | Lead | vs. result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GrayHouseended Nov 1 | 50% | 46% | Pete Ricketts +4 | −2.2 |
| YouGovended Oct 29 · led with the loser | 49% | 49% | Tied | −6.2 |
| The New York Times/Siena Universityended Oct 29 | 48.7% | 43.0% | Pete Ricketts +5.7 | −0.5 |
| Echelon Insightsended Oct 23 | 47% | 46% | Pete Ricketts +1 | −5.2 |
| Median of the final polls | Pete Ricketts +2.5 | −3.7 | ||
| Result | 50.1% | 43.9% | Pete Ricketts +6.2 |
November 3, 2026 · Result (unofficial, 97.55% reporting) · Each pollster's last poll ending in the 21 days before the vote, read for the two leading finishers; the median leaves out polls a side paid for
Pairings that are not the race on the ballot: candidates who lost a primary or withdrew, or a party's unnamed nominee. They are not charted.
Poll data from The New York Times, licensed CC BY 4.0 · Updated November 10, 2026 · 13 polls paid for by a party or campaign are left out
The FEC counts someone as a candidate once they raise or spend more than $5,000.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted