Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › South Dakota U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, South Dakota
Senator since 2015
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
8 priorities from roundsforsenate.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Mike stands with President Trump and his America First agenda. In the Senate, Mike will always fight for and support policies that put South Dakota and America FIRST!
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · roundsforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on roundsforsenate.com/issues ↗ (opens roundsforsenate.com/issues at this heading)
As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Mike is working to make sure our military remains the best in the world. He has consistently been named one of the most effective Republicans in the United States Senate for his work on national security issues.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · roundsforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on roundsforsenate.com/issues ↗ (opens roundsforsenate.com/issues at this heading)
Mike is working with President Trump to lead the effort to eliminate the Department of Education. He believes in local control of education, and while standards are important, a “one size fits all” directive from the federal government does not serve our children well.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · roundsforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on roundsforsenate.com/issues ↗ (opens roundsforsenate.com/issues at this heading)
Mike is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment. He works in the U.S. Senate to protect the rights of law-abiding gun owners.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · roundsforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on roundsforsenate.com/issues ↗ (opens roundsforsenate.com/issues at this heading)
Mike is a strong advocate for American energy independence and supports an “all-of-the-above” approach to energy production. He believes the United States should maximize the use of its natural resources to lower energy costs, create jobs and reduce reliance on foreign energy sources. Mike has opposed excessive federal regulations on energy producers and has consistently backed policies that support domestic energy development.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · roundsforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on roundsforsenate.com/issues ↗ (opens roundsforsenate.com/issues at this heading)
Mike is pro-life and always defends the rights of the unborn. When Mike was working as South Dakota's 31st Governor, he signed a trigger law which went into effect after Roe v. Wade was struck down in 2022. This law prohibits abortion in South Dakota except when the mother’s life is at risk.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · roundsforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on roundsforsenate.com/issues ↗ (opens roundsforsenate.com/issues at this heading)
Mike is committed to protecting law and order. Mike believes that border security is essential to national security, and that we must stop the flow of illegal drugs and human trafficking across our southern border. Mike has consistently supported funding for building the wall, advanced surveillance technology and increased personnel for border enforcement.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · roundsforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on roundsforsenate.com/issues ↗ (opens roundsforsenate.com/issues at this heading)
Mike is committed to protecting Social Security and Medicare for today’s seniors and future generations. He supports commonsense reforms to keep these programs solvent without cutting benefits, making sure they remain strong for years to come.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · roundsforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on roundsforsenate.com/issues ↗ (opens roundsforsenate.com/issues at this heading)
99% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 11 times in the 119th Congress.
Senate Committee on Appropriations
Senate Committee on Armed Services
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00532465
$1.15 has been spent for every dollar raised across 9 reports ($4.4M of $3.8M). Cash on hand went from $2.2M on Mar 31, 2025 to $1.3M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $356,754 | $44,704 | $2,182,079 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $517,658 | $196,560 | $2,503,178 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $580,336 | $265,097 | $2,818,417 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $396,121 | $319,078 | $2,895,460 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $581,484 | $540,069 | $2,936,875 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $213,840 | $493,439 | $2,657,276 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $530,257 | $450,869 | $2,736,664 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $476,188 | $1,464,898 | $1,747,953 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $158,110 | $610,520 | $1,295,543 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 101,471 votes (76%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Won · 184,589 votes (61%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Mike Rounds leads Brian Bengs by 20.6 pointsAverage of the 2 latest nonpartisan polls · 1 far-off poll left out
Latest poll · Emerson College, Oct 21, 2026
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The CRS policy areas of Rounds’ 146 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 746 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.9M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,552 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.6M.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 4 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 25 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $435.5K.
Total reported receipts $3,810,748
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
12% of the money placed by state came from inside South Dakota: $198.3K of $1.6M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 280 contributions · 24% | $386,310 |
| 185 contributions · 12% | $198,336 |
| 88 contributions · 9.3% | $147,600 |
| 142 contributions · 8.6% | $137,415 |
| 83 contributions · 7.9% | $125,872 |
| 68 contributions · 4.9% | $77,944 |
| 203 contributions · 4.6% | $73,986 |
| 50 contributions · 3.9% | $61,832 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 42 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 638 contributions · 11% of ranked | $156,604 |
| Written instead of an employer · 79 contributions · 7.2% of ranked | $98,788 |
| 23 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $49,400 |
| 15 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $47,600 |
| 16 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $36,000 |
| 12 contributions · 2% of ranked | $28,000 |
| 11 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $24,000 |
| 35 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $20,712 |
A further $47,950 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($49,574) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Rounds’s campaign or spending on ads about Rounds are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 48% to named individuals, 32% to organizations, 17% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 3.2% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Attorney, Pajcic & Pajcic · behind Freedom From Politics, Inc. | $772.7K |
| Organization · behind South Dakota Conservative PAC | $522.2K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Retire Career Politicians | $458.3K |
| Person · Chairman, United National Corp. · behind South Dakota Conservative PAC | $200.5K |
| Person · Founding Principal, Route One Investment Co. · behind South Dakota Conservative PAC | $150.3K |
| Organization · behind Defend American Jobs | $141.2K |
| Person · Partner, AH Capital Management · behind American Mission and Defend American Jobs | $106K |
| Organization · behind South Dakota Conservative PAC | $100.2K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Retire Career Politicians | $89.8K |
| Person · Scientist, Icsi · behind Retire Career Politicians | $89.8K |
| Organization · behind Defend American Jobs | $80.9K |
| Organization · behind Defend American Jobs | $73.6K |
Read for the 9 largest groups of 11, 96% of the $3.8M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $19,100 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $4,350,362
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,242 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
86 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $346,324 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 28 payments · 37% of all spending | $1,628,857 |
| 9 payments · 11% of all spending | $501,200 |
| 3 payments · 9.6% of all spending | $422,709 |
| 18 payments · 7.1% of all spending | $313,290 |
| 8 payments · 6.8% of all spending | $296,834 |
| 19 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $151,635 |
| 22 payments · 2.9% of all spending | $128,850 |
| 17 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $124,752 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 637 contributions · 10% of ranked | $155,604 |
| 54 contributions · 6.4% of ranked | $98,081 |
| 62 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $70,082 |
| 42 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $63,843 |
| 15 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 32 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $44,318 |
| 33 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $36,561 |
| 12 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $36,041 |
A further $44,250 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($49,574) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.