Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › LA-04 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, LA-04
Representative since 2017
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
7 priorities from mikejohnson.house.gov, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Because government has refused to live within its means, America is facing an unprecedented debt and spending crisis. Federal debt now exceeds $26 trillion, and our current fiscal path is unsustainable and dangerous, jeopardizing our nation's economic growth, stability and the security of future generations. Congress has a moral and constitutional duty to resolve the crisis, bring spending under control, balance the federal budget, reform and modernize entitlement programs, eliminate fraud, waste and abuse, pursue continued pro-growth tax reforms and permanent tax reductions, and restore regular order and accountability in the budget and appropriations processes.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikejohnson.house.gov/issues/issue
Government often stands as the greatest obstacle to the progress and prosperity of free people. Free markets and free trade agreements allow for innovation, improvement and economic expansion as risk-takers, entrepreneurs and business owners are given the liberty to pursue the American dream and create more jobs and upward mobility for more people. We believe competition should be encouraged, and government intervention and regulation should be limited. The people are better qualified to make decisions about their own lives and finances than bureaucrats, and the private sector will outperform the public sector in virtually every scenario. The free enterprise system rewards hard work and self-sacrifice and is the basis and genius of the American economy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikejohnson.house.gov/issues/issue
Because all men are created equal and in the image of God, every human life has inestimable dignity and value, and every person should be measured only by the content of their character. A just government protects life, honors marriage and family as the primary institutions of a healthy society, and embraces the vital cultural influences of religion and morality. Public policy should always encourage education and emphasize the virtue of hard work as a pathway out of-poverty, while public assistance programs should be reserved only for those who are truly in need. In America, everyone who plays by the rules should get a fair shot. By preserving these ideals, we will maintain the goodness of America that has been the secret to our greatness.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikejohnson.house.gov/issues/issue
The birth of our great nation was inspired by the bold declaration that our individual, God-given liberties should be preserved against government intrusion. That same conviction informs our conservative policy decisions still today.
In America, we proclaim the self-evident truths that all of us are created equal and granted by God the same inherent freedoms, such as the natural and unalienable rights to life, liberty, conscience, free speech and the free exercise of religion, and the ability to pursue happiness, own property, build wealth and defend ourselves and our families. The purpose of government is to secure these rights, and the ideas we advance should always aim to maintain and increase the liberty of the American people.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikejohnson.house.gov/issues/issue
For individual liberty to be championed, government must be reduced. We believe, as our founders did, that legitimate government operates only by the consent of the governed and is more efficient and less corrupt when it is limited in its size and scope. When applied as written, our incomparable Constitution provides important safeguards against government encroachment, a vital separation of powers, and a necessary system of checks and balances. Federalism, decentralized authority, and the elimination of unnecessary regulations and bureaucracy help ensure that government serves the people, and not the other way around. The best protection against government largesse is an engaged and informed electorate.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikejohnson.house.gov/issues/issue
The first obligation of the federal government is to provide for the "common defense" of the United States by protecting our homeland and our strategic interests abroad. Because America serves in a natural role of moral leadership in an increasingly dangerous world, and weakness invites aggression, we must remain the strongest military power on earth fully prepared and capable of defeating any adversaries, tyrants or terrorists, under any circumstances, at any time. Adequate investment is necessary to maintain the air, land, sea, nuclear and cyber warfare.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikejohnson.house.gov/issues/issue
Ours is "a government of laws and not of men," and the rule of law is our foundation. To maintain ordered liberty and a civilized society, public and private virtue should be encouraged, and justice must be administered equally and impartially to all. Each branch of government must adhere to the Constitution, and the judicial branch must not be allowed to assume or exercise legislative or executive powers. Transparency and accountability are keys to good government, and Congress must faithfully perform its constitutional responsibility of oversight.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikejohnson.house.gov/issues/issue
99.8% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 1 time in the 119th Congress.
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Johnson’s 31 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00608695
79¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($19.3M of $24.6M). Cash on hand went from $3.1M on Mar 31, 2025 to $6.5M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $3,236,046 | $1,421,184 | $3,067,239 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $5,453,336 | $1,799,063 | $6,721,512 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $2,728,961 | $1,647,269 | $7,803,203 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $3,081,947 | $1,732,661 | $9,152,489 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $3,048,660 | $1,875,081 | $10,326,068 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $2,999,530 | $3,485,962 | $9,839,636 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 18, 2026 | $428,385 | $654,863 | $9,613,157 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $3,251,043 | $5,336,476 | $7,527,724 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $355,509 | $1,372,485 | $6,510,748 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Not read yet
Won · 134,750 votes (59%) · 1 of 5 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 598,324 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $9.6M.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 3 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 45 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $8.5M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 536 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $3.2M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $24,583,416
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
3.2% of the money placed by state came from inside Louisiana: $308.9K of $9.6M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 77,093 contributions · 13% | $1,258,445 |
| 63,262 contributions · 12% | $1,177,864 |
| 59,697 contributions · 11% | $1,008,726 |
| 14,955 contributions · 3.6% | $343,199 |
| 22,632 contributions · 3.5% | $331,293 |
| 22,110 contributions · 3.3% | $313,253 |
| 7,405 contributions · 3.2% | $308,922 |
| 17,725 contributions · 2.8% | $270,385 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 54 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 515,976 contributions · 85% of ranked | $7,287,279 |
| Written instead of an employer · 16,312 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $381,730 |
| 2,434 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $31,201 |
| Written instead of an employer · 800 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $21,627 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,157 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $19,392 |
| 10 contributions · 0.1% of ranked | $11,005 |
| 976 contributions · 0.1% of ranked | $10,892 |
| 2 contributions · 0.1% of ranked | $10,500 |
A further $200,759 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,296,950) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Johnson’s campaign or spending on ads about Johnson are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 99.9% to named individuals.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Retired · behind A Real Bottom Line PAC | $750.3K |
Read for all 2 groups that spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $29,858 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $19,290,231
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,066 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
112 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $167,089 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 21 payments · 35% of all spending | $6,796,215 |
| 6 payments · 18% of all spending | $3,404,000 |
| 21 payments · 16% of all spending | $3,018,764 |
| 7 payments · 7.1% of all spending | $1,377,602 |
| 13 payments · 5.6% of all spending | $1,085,088 |
| 10 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $705,107 |
| 43 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $519,312 |
| 15 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $317,566 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 515,641 contributions · 81% of ranked | $7,282,894 |
| 1,007 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $135,365 |
| 426 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $80,419 |
| 1,439 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $66,865 |
| 2,211 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $65,563 |
| 903 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $52,845 |
| 1,059 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $49,544 |
| 940 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $43,311 |
A further $180,129 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,296,950) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.