We have not found a campaign site for this candidate yet.
Money
$832.9K raised, $562.2K spent, $270.7K cash on hand (through Jun 30, 2026). Where it comes from
Who gives
0.5% of individual money from donors at $200 or less · 86% from California
Outside groups
$37.5K supporting Agarwal
Their wordsWhat does Agarwal say they will do?
Ethan Agarwal’s words are not shown
We have not found a campaign site for this candidate yet.
MoneyWho pays for the campaign, and where does it go?
Raised
$832.9K
$832,856
Spent
$562.2K
$562,185
Cash on hand
$270.7K
$270,671
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00941674 ↗
Raised, spent and cash over time by FEC report
68¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 3 reports ($562.2K of $832.9K). Cash on hand went from $306.6K on Mar 31, 2026 to $270.7K on Jun 30, 2026.
Raised in the period
Spent in the period
Cash on hand at its close
$200K$400K$600K
Mar ’26
May ’26
Jun ’26
Raised, spent and cash on hand by FEC report
Report
Raised in the period
Spent in the period
Cash on hand at its close
APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026
$413,394
$106,789
$306,605
PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026
$256,358
$355,307
$207,656
JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026
$163,103
$100,088
$270,671
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Where the money came from $832,856 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$728,58287%
Largest donors
Christopher Boies5 contributions, latest May 29, 2026 · NEW YORK, NY$16,600
Phillip J. Hellmuth6 contributions, latest Mar 18, 2026 · SAN FRANCISCO, CA$15,320
Immad Akhund3 contributions, latest May 8, 2026 · CEO · ASHAKI · SAN FRANCISCO, CA$14,000
Isaac Applbaum4 contributions, latest May 29, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · OAKLAND, CA$12,000
Anika Agarwal5 contributions, latest Mar 24, 2026 · NEW YORK, NY$9,026
Vijay Brihmadesam3 contributions, latest Mar 10, 2026 · EXECUTIVE · HOME FRONT PUMPS · NEW YORK, NY$7,675
Alesia Haas4 contributions, latest Mar 17, 2026 · SANTA CRUZ, CA$7,660
Michael Antonov4 contributions, latest Mar 30, 2026 · CRO · DEEPORIGIN · SAN FRANCISCO, CA$7,046
Isaac Agam2 contributions, latest Apr 4, 2026 · RETIRED · LOS ALTOS, CA$7,000
Anishka Agarwal2 contributions, latest Mar 31, 2026 · FOUNDING GROWTH · SUMMATION · MONTE SERENO, CA$7,000
Sujata Agarwal2 contributions, latest Mar 4, 2026 · RETIRED · LOS GATOS, CA$7,000
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 320 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $714.6K.
LoansMoney the campaign borrowed this cycle, from the candidate or a lender, which it may repay.$99,90012%
Who lent it
Agarwal Ethan2 loans · repaid$83,000
Agarwal Ethanthe candidate’s own money · lent May 27, 2026 · $16.9K not yet repaid$16,900
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Jun 30, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$3,9700.5%
Other receiptsInterest, dividends and other income the committee files on a line of its own.$404<0.1%
Total reported receipts $832,856
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Jun 30, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $723,754 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $24.9K
$24.9K+
$99.5K+
$223.9K+
$398K+
none
Outlined: California, home state
Home state and away
California 86%CA 86%Elsewhere 14%
86% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $621.9K of $723.8K.
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California home278 contributions · 86%
$621,916
New York24 contributions · 6.9%
$49,661
Illinois4 contributions · 1.9%
$14,000
Massachusetts4 contributions · 1.5%
$11,000
Oklahoma
Money from groups, by interest $37,500
What the committees giving to Agarwal’s campaign or spending on ads about Agarwal are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
For Agarwal $37,500
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
$37.5KTap a slice
Groups set up for one candidate or one race: no parent organization, and 80% or more of their spending on that race, for a candidate, against their rival, or both. A group that is part of an older organization (a trade, union or caucus PAC, or a party leaders’ super PAC shell) stays in its own place even when it spends on one race, and one that has spread across races is filed by its side.$37.5K100%
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Who stands behind the outside spending: the people and organizations its money traces to
Who stands behind the outside spending $75.4K traced back through the groups that spent it
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 99.5% to named individuals.
People and organizations the race's outside spending traces to
Name
Amount
Kenneth BahlPerson · behind Viable PAC
$18.2K
Sujata AgarwalPerson · National Director, Ascension · behind Viable PAC
Lars JohanssonPerson · Managing Director, New Mountain Capital · behind Viable PAC
$12.1K
Nicholas GoldbergPerson · Attorney, Keker VAN Nest and Peters · behind Viable PAC
$6.1K
Andrew PuschelPerson · Business Executive, Self-Employed · behind Viable PAC
$6.1K
Alan JacksonPerson · Attorney, WJQ LLP · behind Viable PAC
What the payments were for $469,985 itemized
The campaign also refunded $9,189 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$191,67140%
Filed as
DIGITAL ADVERTISING$129,500
VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES$58,971
RADIO ADVERTISEMENT$3,200
Paid to
Powers Interactive Digital LLC$129,500
Coverdale, Inc.$58,971
Fremont Broadcasting LLC$2,200
Punjabi Radio USA, Inc.$1,000
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Powers Interactive Digital LLC3 payments · 23% of all spending
$129,500
Convergence Targeted Communications5 payments · 11% of all spending
$63,527
Coverdale, Inc.3 payments · 10% of all spending
$58,971
Jay Cheng Strategy3 payments · 7.1% of all spending
$40,000
Good Fight Political Inc.3 payments · 5.4% of all spending
$30,335
Efundraising Connections49 payments · 4.1% of all spending
$23,119
RMS Associates2 payments · 3.6% of all spending
$20,000
The Political Law Group5 payments · 2.9% of all spending
$16,540
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
EndorsementsWho does Agarwal’s campaign say backs them?
Not read yet
We have not found a campaign site for Ethan Agarwal yet.
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Campaign pages read 0 pages
No campaign pages quoted
We have not found a campaign site for this candidate yet.
2 contributions · 1%
$7,000
Texas2 contributions · 1%
$7,000
Florida5 contributions · 0.7%
$5,427
Arizona1 contribution · 0.5%
$3,500
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 14 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 44 contributions · 12% of ranked
$85,077
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 29 contributions · 7.9% of ranked
$55,252
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 23 contributions · 7% of ranked
$49,174
Sierra Circuits12 contributions · 6% of ranked
$42,000
Coinbase7 contributions · 3.1% of ranked
$21,330
Ashaki3 contributions · 2% of ranked
$14,000
SV Angel4 contributions · 2% of ranked
$14,000
VOX Funding4 contributions · 1.7% of ranked
$11,800
A further $25,001 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,970) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 46 contributions · 12% of ranked
$86,577
CEO23 contributions · 9% of ranked
$63,300
Investor22 contributions · 9% of ranked
$63,270
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 29 contributions · 7.9% of ranked
$55,252
Venture Capital8 contributions · 3.5% of ranked
$24,665
Executive13 contributions · 3.5% of ranked
$24,198
Self-employedWritten instead of an occupation · 6 contributions · 2.5% of ranked
$17,860
Managing Partner6 contributions · 2.5% of ranked
$17,665
A further $23,141 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,970) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Viable PAC▼ Opposes1 record, latest May 28, 2026$37,500
Support and oppose are each group’s own labels, not a judgment made here.
$38,212 of the race total was filed about other candidates, so it would not show on Agarwal’s own record.
Independent expenditures (Schedule E) only. Electioneering communications and corporate or union member communications file separately; they are counted for Agarwalunder “Other outside spending” in the full finance detail, but not for the rest of the field, so every other row is a floor.
$2.1K
Read for the 5 largest groups of 6, 99.5% of the $75.7K spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.
$114,44224%
Filed as
CAMPAIGN CONSULTING SERVICES$70,000
LEGAL SERVICES$31,442
GENERAL CONSULTING$10,000
COMPLIANCE SOFTWARE$3,000
Paid to
Jay Cheng Strategy$40,000
The Political Law Group$31,442
RMS Associates$20,000
Musich, Lisa$10,000
Siracusa, Michael$10,000
Integrated Solutions: Political$3,000
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$63,40813%
Filed as
DIRECT MAIL$57,908
WEBSITE DESIGN$5,500
Paid to
Convergence Targeted Communications$63,408
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$34,5407.3%
Filed as
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$30,335
ELECTION DAY EVENT$2,346
DONOR MEETING$906
CAMPAIGN EVENT CATERING$322
DONOR MEETING - BEVERAGES$265
CANDIDATE LODGING - DONOR EVENT$227
REIMBURSEMENT FOR CAMPAIGN EVENT$137
Paid to
Good Fight Political Inc.$30,335
Amber India Foods$2,346
Nobu$906
LA Mediteranee Cafe$322
Straits Restaurant$265
The ROW Hotel$227
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$30,0346.3%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES$24,805
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEE$5,229
Paid to
Efundraising Connections$23,119
ActBlue Technical Services$5,880
Democracy Engine LLC$1,035
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$14,3693%
Filed as
CAMPAIGN RESEARCH SERVICES$14,250
DATA SERVICES$119
Paid to
SL Research LLC$14,250
Convergence Targeted Communications$119
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$12,7542.7%
Filed as
CANDIDATE STATEMENT FEE$8,450
CANDIDATE STATEMENT FILING FEE$1,891
CANDIDATE FILING FEE$1,740
BANK FEE$673
Paid to
Santa Clara Registrar of Voters$8,450
Alameda County$1,891
Secretary of State$1,740
California Bank & Trust$673
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$12,2522.6%
Filed as
OFFICE RENT$8,438
PURCHASE OF USED OFFICE EQUIPTMENT FROM NONFEDERAL COMMITTEE (FAIR MARKET VALUE)$3,159
CAMPAIGN SUPPLIES$655
Paid to
Kumagai, Roland$8,438
Ethan Agarwal for Governor$3,159
Amazon$655
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$439<0.1%
Filed as
CANDIDATE LODGING$439
Paid to
BOOKING.COM$439
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$184<0.1%
Filed as
SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION$184
Paid to
Claude AI$184
Total itemized disbursements $469,985
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Jun 30, 2026.
All 147 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
3 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $5,345 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.