Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-21 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, CA-21
Has not served in Congress
6 priorities from kirkland2026.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Housing, food, gas, and healthcare are brutally expensive because of decades of over-regulation and mismanagement. Families in CA-21 need affordable abundance—not excuses.
We need business leaders who can solve problems and get results, not career politicians invested in maintaining the status quo. Kyle Kirkland has done the work in the Central Valley and is ready to make government serve you.
- Make housing, food, gas, and healthcare affordable by ending over-regulation and mismanagement.
- Target government waste and fraud to deliver value for taxpayers.
- Deliver results and accountability drawn from decades of building businesses and payrolls.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · kirkland2026.com
Housing, food, gas, and healthcare are brutally expensive. Kyle will end over-regulation, restart domestic production, and attack the cost-of-living crisis head-on.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · kirkland2026.com
Heading as listed on kirkland2026.com ↗ (opens kirkland2026.com at this heading)
Stop waste and fraud, demand audits, and require government to serve families—not itself—so every tax dollar delivers results.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · kirkland2026.com
Heading as listed on kirkland2026.com ↗ (opens kirkland2026.com at this heading)
Give law enforcement the tools to stop fentanyl, human trafficking, and cartel violence while respecting legal immigration.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · kirkland2026.com
Heading as listed on kirkland2026.com ↗ (opens kirkland2026.com at this heading)
Build storage, modernize delivery, and end the regulatory chokehold that hurts growers and farmworkers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · kirkland2026.com
Heading as listed on kirkland2026.com ↗ (opens kirkland2026.com at this heading)
Back the blue, support first responders, and end soft-on-crime policies that put families at risk.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · kirkland2026.com
Heading as listed on kirkland2026.com ↗ (opens kirkland2026.com at this heading)
Return to high standards, empower parents, and expand career pathways for the next generation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · kirkland2026.com
Heading as listed on kirkland2026.com ↗ (opens kirkland2026.com at this heading)
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00926600
97¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 6 reports ($451.6K of $464.7K). Cash on hand went from $30.6K on Dec 31, 2025 to $13.1K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $108,195 | $77,546 | $30,648 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $144,724 | $95,550 | $79,822 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $58,745 | $85,586 | $52,982 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $27,307 | $62,355 | $17,934 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $118,260 | $129,680 | $6,513 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $7,470 | $882 | $13,101 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
23 endorsers listed on Kyle Kirkland’s own campaign site: 4 parties, 13 officials, 5 organizations, 1 person.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Official Party Endorsement
Fresno County Republican Party
Official Party Endorsement
Tulare County Republican Party
Official Party Endorsement
US Congressman, District 20
US Congressman, District 5
State Senator, District 12
State Assemblymember, District 5
State Assemblymember, District 8
State Assemblymember, District 33
State Assemblymember, District 75
County Supervisor, Fresno County, District 2
Fresno Police Officers' Association
FPOA
California Rifle & Pistol Association PAC
CRPA PAC
Statewide Grassroots Movement
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association PAC
HJTA PAC
Host, KMJ News Talk 580/105.9
Advanced · 27,076 votes (26%) · 2 of 6 · Full results ↗
Lost · 38,319 votes (37%) · 2 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 286 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $239.8K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $464,700
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
76% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $184.7K of $243.3K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 129 contributions · 76% | $184,713 |
| 6 contributions · 5.1% | $12,500 |
| 5 contributions · 5% | $12,210 |
| 83 contributions · 4.8% | $11,730 |
| 2 contributions · 2.9% | $7,000 |
| 27 contributions · 2.6% | $6,309 |
| 10 contributions · 1.7% | $4,208 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% | $3,000 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 17 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 24 contributions · 21% of ranked | $50,387 |
| Written instead of an employer · 163 contributions · 6.6% of ranked | $15,516 |
| 2 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 4 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $8,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 4 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $8,500 |
| 2 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $7,500 |
| 2 contributions · 3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $7,500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($40,955) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Kirkland’s campaign or spending on ads about Kirkland are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 85% to named individuals, 3.2% to organizations, 5.3% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 6% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · behind The Conservative Caucus DBA Americans for Constitutional Liberty | $3.8K |
Read for all 4 groups that spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $9,298 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $441,419
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 250 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
13 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $129,901 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 13 payments · 29% of all spending | $129,199 |
| 11 payments · 12% of all spending | $55,545 |
| 2 payments · 8% of all spending | $36,276 |
| 5 payments · 5.6% of all spending | $25,387 |
| 29 payments · 5.3% of all spending | $23,935 |
| 5 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $18,686 |
| 1 payment · 3.3% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 7 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $11,719 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5 contributions · 8.8% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 5 contributions · 6.6% of ranked | $15,550 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 163 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $15,516 |
| 8 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $15,500 |
| 5 contributions · 6.3% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 7 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 3 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $8,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 4 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $8,500 |
A further $6,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($40,955) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.