Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › WI-06 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, WI-06
Representative since 2015
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
1 priority from glenngrothman.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
- Promote skills-based education.
- Keep open work centers for those with disabilities.
- Get rid of the marriage penalty for government assistance programs.
- Refinance student loans.
- Get more generic medication on the market.
- Restore integrity to our elections.
- Secure our borders and fix our broken immigration system.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · glenngrothman.com
Heading as listed on glenngrothman.com ↗ (opens glenngrothman.com at this heading)
96% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 25 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
House Committee on the Judiciary
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Grothman’s 104 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00561597
92¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1.1M of $1.2M). Cash on hand went from $457.6K on Mar 31, 2025 to $615.5K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $45,236 | $110,086 | $457,640 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $140,024 | $95,136 | $502,529 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $173,632 | $92,530 | $583,631 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $145,015 | $83,764 | $644,882 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $130,638 | $75,229 | $700,290 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $230,696 | $127,384 | $803,603 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 22, 2026 | $63,779 | $37,646 | $829,736 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $214,783 | $227,682 | $816,836 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $65,205 | $266,516 | $615,525 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 0 votes (0%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Won · 172,138 votes (53%) · 1 of 5 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,235 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $722.9K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 210 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $396K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $1,209,007
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
85% of the money placed by state came from inside Wisconsin: $621.3K of $732.4K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,150 contributions · 85% | $621,311 |
| 24 contributions · 4.8% | $35,090 |
| 16 contributions · 2% | $14,750 |
| 4 contributions · 1.9% | $14,000 |
| 11 contributions · 1.7% | $12,442 |
| 3 contributions · 1.4% | $10,100 |
| 6 contributions · 0.6% | $4,500 |
| 8 contributions · 0.6% | $4,500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 16 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 672 contributions · 42% of ranked | $296,603 |
| Written instead of an employer · 97 contributions · 5% of ranked | $35,245 |
| 4 contributions · 2% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $11,000 |
| 11 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 5 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $10,200 |
| 3 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $10,100 |
| 6 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $8,000 |
A further $16,130 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($118,912) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Grothman’s campaign or spending on ads about Grothman are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 93% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 7% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Building Together | $20.8K |
Read for all 3 groups that spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $13,025 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $966,823
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 826 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
8 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $8,014 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 118 payments · 17% of all spending | $189,794 |
| 19 payments · 15% of all spending | $162,500 |
| 22 payments · 11% of all spending | $119,139 |
| 1 payment · 5.8% of all spending | $65,000 |
| 24 payments · 5.4% of all spending | $60,000 |
| 35 payments · 5% of all spending | $56,128 |
| 8 payments · 4.4% of all spending | $48,683 |
| 1 payment · 3% of all spending | $33,320 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 740 contributions · 47% of ranked | $336,013 |
| 44 contributions · 6.2% of ranked | $44,325 |
| 24 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $34,600 |
| 20 contributions · 4% of ranked | $28,950 |
| 27 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $24,922 |
| 19 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $22,050 |
| 5 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $17,100 |
| 14 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $12,750 |
A further $15,130 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($118,912) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.