Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › PA-12 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, PA-12
Has not served in Congress
6 priorities from jameshayesforpa.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
I’ve seen how overregulation has crushed local businesses and sent jobs elsewhere. I’m committed to policies that support working families, bring back good-paying union jobs, and protect small business owners. It’s time to rebuild our economy—with Western Pennsylvania workers at the center of it.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jameshayesforpa.com/policy-vision
Public safety isn’t political—it’s personal. After losing my son to violent crime, I’ve made it my mission to ensure our communities are safe. That means supporting law enforcement, investing in crime prevention, and making sure repeat violent offenders are held accountable.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jameshayesforpa.com/policy-vision
Every child deserves a great education—regardless of their zip code. I support expanding school choice so families can find the best fit for their children. Let’s give teachers the tools they need and empower parents to be true partners in education.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jameshayesforpa.com/policy-vision
I believe in an America where every person is treated with dignity—no matter their background, faith, or where they come from. My platform is rooted in freedom, opportunity, and respect. I also believe in standing by our allies, including Israel, to keep America and the world safe.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jameshayesforpa.com/policy-vision
Western Pennsylvania has a proud legacy in energy. I support an all-of-the-above energy strategy that keeps our lights on, creates local jobs, and breaks our dependence on foreign powers. We can lead the future—right here at home.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jameshayesforpa.com/policy-vision
It’s time to rein in wasteful government spending. I’ll fight for transparency, balance the books, and work across the aisle to bring accountability and civility back to Congress. We owe it to our kids and grandkids to get this right.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jameshayesforpa.com/policy-vision
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00838185
87¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($69.9K of $80.5K). Cash on hand went from $711 on Mar 31, 2025 to $11.3K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $350 | $325 | $711 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $3,060 | $91 | $3,679 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $1,675 | $190 | $5,164 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $5,801 | $2,778 | $8,187 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $13,854 | $3,500 | $18,541 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 29, 2026 | $2,366 | $9,353 | $11,554 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $13,033 | $15,065 | $9,521 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $24,752 | $31,795 | $2,478 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $15,643 | $6,847 | $11,274 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
No endorsers named
Advanced · 23,710 votes (100%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Lost · 102,638 votes (34%) · 2 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 87 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $53.3K.
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 3 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $4.8K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $80,534
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
96% of the money placed by state came from inside Pennsylvania: $51.3K of $53.3K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 85 contributions · 96% | $51,300 |
| 1 contribution · 1.9% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.9% | $1,000 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 3 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 43 contributions · 31% of ranked | $16,300 |
| 3 contributions · 7.5% of ranked | $4,000 |
| 1 contribution · 6.6% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 4 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $3,050 |
| 1 contribution · 4.7% of ranked | $2,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 4.7% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 2 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $2,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 2 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $2,250 |
A further $300 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($20,684) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 43 contributions · 31% of ranked | $16,300 |
| 2 contributions · 8.5% of ranked | $4,500 |
| 2 contributions · 7.5% of ranked | $4,000 |
| 3 contributions · 7.5% of ranked | $4,000 |
| 6 contributions · 7.2% of ranked | $3,800 |
| 2 contributions · 6.6% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 3 contributions · 6.2% of ranked | $3,300 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 4.7% of ranked | $2,500 |
A further $300 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($20,684) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Hayes’s campaign or spending on ads about Hayes are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 17% to named individuals, 14% to organizations, 41% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 27% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Solidarity Victory PAC and API PA Votes | $10.2K |
| Organization · behind Working Families Party PAC | $2.1K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Working Families Party PAC | $2K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Working Families Party PAC | $1.1K |
Read for the 8 largest groups of 10, 90% of the $36.3K spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $1 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $63,208
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 136 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $225 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 27 payments · 25% of all spending | $17,267 |
| 6 payments · 14% of all spending | $10,100 |
| 10 payments · 8.5% of all spending | $5,975 |
| 16 payments · 7.6% of all spending | $5,281 |
| 1 payment · 4.5% of all spending | $3,164 |
| 4 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $2,750 |
| 2 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $2,178 |
| 1 payment · 3% of all spending | $2,128 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.