Sofia Bombay3 contributions, latest Jun 30, 2026 · CHARLOTTE, NC$10,500
George Daniels3 contributions, latest Jun 30, 2026 · ORLANDO, FL$10,500
Mayura Deshmukh3 contributions, latest Jun 30, 2026 · ROUND ROCK, TX$10,500
Gagandeep Kaur3 contributions, latest Jun 30, 2026 · EASTON, CT$10,500
Ravikisho Konda3 contributions, latest Jun 30, 2026 · PLEASANTON, CA$10,500
Shivaram Kota3 contributions, latest Jun 30, 2026 · PLEASANTON, CA$10,500
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 669 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $262K.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$61,3121.7%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees. Corporations and unions cannot give directly.$10,0000.3%
Committees that gave
Hindu American PAC1 receipt, latest Jun 20, 2025 · PAC (qualified)$5,000
The 2 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 2 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $10K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Other receiptsInterest, dividends and other income the committee files on a line of its own.$2,164<0.1%
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the campaign: rebates and refunds of what it spent.$191<0.1%
Total reported receipts $3,688,103
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $354,317 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $8.1K
$8.1K+
$32.6K+
$73.3K+
$130.2K+
none
Outlined: California, home state
Home state and away
California 57%CA 57%Elsewhere 43%
57% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $203.5K of $354.3K.
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California home163 contributions · 57%
$203,495
Texas319 contributions · 22%
$79,541
Connecticut6 contributions · 5.9%
$21,000
New York
Money from groups, by interest $10,000
What the committees giving to Kruttiventi’s campaign or spending on ads about Kruttiventi are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
For Kruttiventi $10,000
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
$10KTap a slice
Clearly political, but nothing yet shows a cause or a side: not their own words, their funders or a published source.Placed by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.$5K50%
Nothing yet says what these committees are: no statement, site, government record or funder we can use. Their money counts here until a source turns up. We do not guess.$5K50%
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Outside spending $8,859,535 across this race
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
DAdam C. Gray14 groups▲Supporting $117.5K▼Opposing $6MTotal $6.1M
Who stands behind the outside spending: the people and organizations its money traces to
Who stands behind the outside spending $8.8M traced back through the groups that spent it
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 40% to named individuals, 25% to organizations, 27% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 7.3% not itemized in the filings.
People and organizations the race's outside spending traces to
Name
Amount
American Action NetworkOrganization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind CLF
$1.4M
Elon MuskPerson · CEO, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. · behind CLF and NO Going Back PAC Inc. and 1 more
$674.9K
House Majority ForwardOrganization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind HMP
Miriam AdelsonPerson · Physician, Adelson Drug Clinic · behind CLF and NO Going Back PAC Inc. and 1 more
$232.5K
What the payments were for $2,495,058 itemized
The campaign also refunded $96,349 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$1,313,32753%
Filed as
DEBT FORGIVEN$1,222,917
POLITICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES$44,000
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Kruttiventi , VIN25 payments · 49% of all spending
$1,797,478
RMC - Revolutionizing Microtargeted Campaigns13 payments · 12% of all spending
$459,880
Martinez, Brett21 payments · 1.6% of all spending
$59,790
Frontline Strategies, Llc/frontline Strategies Agency101 payments · 1% of all spending
$38,751
Saligram and Associates, LLC10 payments · 0.8% of all spending
$30,994
Jass Sangha Consulting12 payments · 0.8% of all spending
$30,000
Felipe, Emily9 payments · 0.5% of all spending
$19,779
VLC Financial Services26 payments · 0.5% of all spending
$17,559
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
EndorsementsWho does Kruttiventi’s campaign say backs them?
Not read yet
We have not found a campaign site for Vin Kruttiventi yet.
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Campaign pages read 0 pages
No campaign pages quoted
We have not found a campaign site for this candidate yet.
9 contributions · 4.4%
$15,738
Florida102 contributions · 4.2%
$14,884
North Carolina3 contributions · 3%
$10,500
Nevada3 contributions · 0.4%
$1,526
North Dakota4 contributions · 0.3%
$1,030
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 23 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
A5 Corp9 contributions · 9.3% of ranked
$21,777
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 12 contributions · 6% of ranked
$14,050
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 496 contributions · 4.8% of ranked
$11,251
Praveen Ankaraju (self-employed)4 contributions · 3.9% of ranked
$9,164
Workday4 contributions · 3.3% of ranked
$7,670
Custsat Info Tech INC4 contributions · 3% of ranked
$7,009
Healthcare4 contributions · 3% of ranked
$7,009
Daniels Manufacturing Corp2 contributions · 3% of ranked
$7,000
A further $121,315 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($61,312) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 525 contributions · 12% of ranked
$30,238
IT Professional13 contributions · 8% of ranked
$20,343
Owner7 contributions · 5.9% of ranked
$15,000
Program Manager5 contributions · 4.7% of ranked
$12,000
President3 contributions · 3.5% of ranked
$9,000
Project Manager3 contributions · 2.8% of ranked
$7,250
Director3 contributions · 2.8% of ranked
$7,208
Software Engineer4 contributions · 2.8% of ranked
$7,009
A further $99,828 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($61,312) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
CLF▼ Opposes25 records, latest Oct 26, 2026$5,808,062
Support and oppose are each group’s own labels, not a judgment made here.
$8,859,535 of the race total was filed about other candidates, so it would not show on Kruttiventi’s own record.
Independent expenditures (Schedule E) only. Electioneering communications and corporate or union member communications file separately; they are counted for Kruttiventiunder “Other outside spending” in the full finance detail, but not for the rest of the field, so every other row is a floor.
Howard W. LutnickPerson · Secretary of Commerce, United States Department of Commerce · behind CLF
$112.2K
Read for the 18 largest groups of 20, 99.9% of the $8.9M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
YOUTH & VOLUNTEER ENGAGEMENT DIRECTOR
$16,250
TREASURER SERVICES$12,853
No description filed$11,527
VOLUNTEER RECRUITMENT$2,468
VOLUNTEER/JOB CANDIDATE SEARCH$2,455
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES$350
TREASURER SERVICS$288
VOLUNTEER LUNCH$148
LUNCH FOR VOLUNTEERS$58
REFRESHMENTS$12
Paid to
Kruttiventi , VIN$1,222,917
Martinez, Brett$44,465
VLC Financial Services$17,559
Felipe, Emily$16,250
Saligram and Associates, LLC$6,994
Indeed$4,923
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$451,25918%
Not broken out by the committeeReported as a lump sum, with memo entries pointed to for the detail. Where those entries were filed and read, this page counts the payees they name instead; what is left here was never itemised.$243,1299.7%
Filed as
SEE MEMO ITEMS$238,467
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT - SEE MEMO ENTRIES$4,662
Paid to
Kruttiventi , VIN$238,467
Martinez, Brett$4,080
Felipe, Emily$582
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$193,8987.8%
Filed as
IN-KIND: CONSULTING SERVICES, DATA, VOTER CONTACT, MEALS, MEETINGS, TEXT PROGRAM & OFFICE EXPENSES$192,398
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$128,6035.2%
Filed as
ONLINE FUNDRAISING COMMISSION$35,837
GENERAL & FUNDRAISING CONSULTING SERVICES$20,000
FUNDRAISING CONSULTANT$12,000
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$12,000
FUNDRAISING DIRECT MAIL PIECE$10,948
GENERAL & FUNDRAISING CONSULTANT SERVICES$10,000
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING SERVICES$6,026
IN-KIND: FOOD, BEVERAGES AND VENUE FOR FUNDRAISER (7/13/25)$6,000
IN-KIND: FOOD, BEVERAGES AND VENUE FOR FUNDRAISER (9/21/25)$4,400
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 427 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
3 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $6,306 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.