We have not found a campaign site for this candidate yet.
Money
$624.5K raised, $619.5K spent, $4.9K cash on hand (through Sep 30, 2026). Where it comes from
Who gives
3.1% of individual money from donors at $200 or less · 90% from California · largest committee giver INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES POLITICAL ACTION TOGETHER POLITICAL COMMITTEE, $2.5K
Outside groups
$8.6K supporting Torre
Their wordsWhat does Torre say they will do?
Hector De La Torre’s words are not shown
We have not found a campaign site for this candidate yet.
MoneyWho pays for the campaign, and where does it go?
Raised
$624.5K
$624,480
Spent
$619.5K
$619,540
Cash on hand
$4.9K
$4,941
FEC filings, Oct 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00926642 ↗
Raised, spent and cash over time by FEC report
99¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($619.5K of $624.5K). Cash on hand went from $265.8K on Dec 31, 2025 to $4.9K on Sep 30, 2026.
Raised in the period
Spent in the period
Cash on hand at its close
$200K$400K$600K
Dec ’25
Mar ’26
May ’26
Jun ’26
Sep ’26
Raised, spent and cash on hand by FEC report
Report
Raised in the period
Spent in the period
Cash on hand at its close
YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025
$279,582
$13,767
$265,815
APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026
$227,105
$56,965
$435,954
PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026
$48,315
$331,287
$152,982
JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026
$64,830
$176,919
$40,893
OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026
$4,648
$40,601
$4,941
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Where the money came from $624,480 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$592,32995%
Largest donors
Eileen Brown4 contributions, latest Jun 30, 2026 · LOS ANGELES, CA$11,800
Sandra Berg4 contributions, latest Dec 24, 2025 · LOS ANGELES, CA$7,500
John Collinson3 contributions, latest Dec 31, 2025 · NON-PROFIT CONSULTANT · SELF · LOS ANGELES, CA$7,000
Christine De La Torre2 contributions, latest Dec 31, 2025 · EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR · GATEWAY CITIES COG · PARAMOUNT, CA$7,000
Chris Fletcher2 contributions, latest Dec 17, 2025 · REAL ESTATE · SELF · CORONA DEL MAR, CA$7,000
Arnold Glasman2 contributions, latest Dec 24, 2025 · ATTORNEY · ALVAREZ-GLASMAN & COLVIN · LA PUENTE, CA$7,000
Kyle Kazan2 contributions, latest Dec 22, 2025 · CHAIRMAN · BEACH FRONT PROPERTY MANAGEMENT · LONG BEACH, CA$7,000
Cynthia Lyons2 contributions, latest Dec 22, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · BEVERLY HILLS, CA$7,000
Charles Lyons III2 contributions, latest Dec 22, 2025 · REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT · LYONS & LYONS PROPERTIES · BEVERLY HILLS, CA$7,000
Ian Montone2 contributions, latest Dec 30, 2025 · MUSIC · SELF · SANTA MONICA, CA$7,000
James Rosenwald2 contributions, latest Nov 23, 2025 · PROFESSOR/CIO · NYU/ROSENWALD CAPITAL · REDONDO BEACH, CA$7,000
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 517 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $557.1K.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$18,7433%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees. Corporations and unions cannot give directly.$10,5001.7%
The 2 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 2 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $4.5K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Other receiptsInterest, dividends and other income the committee files on a line of its own.$2,9080.5%
Total reported receipts $624,480
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $560,729 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $20.1K
$20.1K+
$80.4K+
$180.9K+
$321.5K+
none
Outlined: California, home state
Home state and away
California 90%CA 90%
90% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $502.4K of $560.7K.
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California home470 contributions · 90%
$502,370
Florida7 contributions · 1.8%
$10,250
Idaho3 contributions · 1.3%
$7,250
Virginia5 contributions · 1.2%
$6,750
Money from groups, by interest $13,125
What the committees giving to Torre’s campaign or spending on ads about Torre are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
For Torre $13,125
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
$13.1KTap a slice
Groups set up for one candidate or one race: no parent organization, and 80% or more of their spending on that race, for a candidate, against their rival, or both. A group that is part of an older organization (a trade, union or caucus PAC, or a party leaders’ super PAC shell) stays in its own place even when it spends on one race, and one that has spread across races is filed by its side.$8.6K66%
Unions of electricians, plumbers, carpenters, laborers and other construction trades.Placed by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.$2.5K19%
Another candidate’s own campaign committee, or a joint fundraising committee. Money one campaign gives another counts here.$2K15%
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Outside spending $360,113 across this race
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
DHector De La Torrethis candidate1 group▲Supporting $8.6K▼Opposing $0Total $8.6K
Who stands behind the outside spending: the people and organizations its money traces to
Who stands behind the outside spending $360.1K traced back through the groups that spent it
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 9.6% to named individuals, 43% to organizations, 6.4% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 40% not itemized in the filings.
People and organizations the race's outside spending traces to
Name
Amount
Proximo ActionOrganization · behind Bold America
$82K
United Futures Inc.Organization · behind Bold America
$31.9K
Opportunity Forward AllianceOrganization · behind Bold America
$19K
American Israel Public Affairs CommitteeOrganization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Bold America
$18.3K
James RosenwaldPerson · behind People for Effective & Ethical Leadership
$8.6K
Community Forward InitiativeOrganization · behind Bold America
What the payments were for $580,443 itemized
The campaign also refunded $40,400 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$291,83750%
Filed as
PRINTING,MAILING SERVICE,POSTAGE$272,838
MAILER$8,000
PRINTING$6,400
SLATE CARD MAILER$4,600
Paid to
Press Print, Inc.$272,838
Landslide Digital LLC$8,000
Political Data Intelligence, Inc.$6,400
Election Digest$4,600
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Press Print, Inc.10 payments · 44% of all spending
$272,838
Yosemite Consulting3 payments · 17% of all spending
$103,000
Buchert Development LLC4 payments · 6.5% of all spending
$40,156
Goodwin Simon Strategic Research, Inc.1 payment · 5.9% of all spending
$36,856
Landslide Digital LLC8 payments · 4% of all spending
$24,800
ActBlue38 payments · 3.4% of all spending
$21,159
Haymarket Strategies, Inc.1 payment · 3.2% of all spending
$20,000
Meeno, Inc.3 payments · 2.3% of all spending
$14,300
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
EndorsementsWho does Torre’s campaign say backs them?
Not read yet
We have not found a campaign site for Hector De La Torre yet.
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Campaign pages read 0 pages
No campaign pages quoted
We have not found a campaign site for this candidate yet.
Michigan4 contributions · 1.1%
$6,000
District of Columbia6 contributions · 1%
$5,500
Texas4 contributions · 0.8%
$4,250
New York5 contributions · 0.7%
$3,750
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 18 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 109 contributions · 25% of ranked
$125,659
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 44 contributions · 8.8% of ranked
$44,670
Beach Front Property Management4 contributions · 2.8% of ranked
$14,000
Brown's Building Blocks LLC3 contributions · 1.9% of ranked
$9,400
Berg Lacquer Co3 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$7,250
Alvarez-glasman & Colvin2 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$7,000
AVX2 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$7,000
Cigna2 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$7,000
A further $37,150 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($18,743) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 111 contributions · 23% of ranked
$130,159
Attorney49 contributions · 10% of ranked
$55,650
CEO22 contributions · 5.6% of ranked
$31,250
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 26 contributions · 4.5% of ranked
$24,850
Executive12 contributions · 2.9% of ranked
$16,000
Consultant28 contributions · 2.8% of ranked
$15,350
Chairman7 contributions · 2.2% of ranked
$12,500
President15 contributions · 2.1% of ranked
$11,750
A further $4,150 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($18,743) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Bold America▲ Supports3 records, latest May 18, 2026$300,000
Support and oppose are each group’s own labels, not a judgment made here.
$351,488 of the race total was filed about other candidates, so it would not show on Torre’s own record.
Independent expenditures (Schedule E) only. Electioneering communications and corporate or union member communications file separately; they are counted for Torreunder “Other outside spending” in the full finance detail, but not for the rest of the field, so every other row is a floor.
$5.4K
International Bancshares Corp.Organization · behind Bold America
$3.7K
Peterson Solutions FundOrganization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Bold America
$3.7K
JP Morgan ChaseOrganization · behind National Association of Realtors PAC
$3.4K
CoinbaseOrganization · behind Bold America
$2.5K
Chain Bridge BankOrganization · behind Bold America
$2.2K
Susan SarofimPerson · Philanthropist, Self Employed · behind Bold America
$2.1K
Read for all 5 groups that spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$128,67322%
Filed as
DIGITAL CONSULTING$88,723
CAMPAIGN CONSULTING$20,000
CAMPAIGN CONSULTING - 4/16-5/31/2026$4,500
GRAPHIC DESIGN CONSULTING$4,200
ACCOUNTING CONSULTING$4,000
COMPLIANCE CONSULTING$4,000
ACCOUNTING CONSULTING - 11/2025, 12/2025$3,250
Paid to
Yosemite Consulting$83,723
Haymarket Strategies, Inc.$20,000
Leiderman & Associates, Inc.$7,250
Brainworm, Inc.$5,000
Pearson, Eboney$4,500
Landslide Digital LLC$4,200
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$44,6217.7%
Filed as
RESEARCH SERVICES$36,856
DATA SERVICES$5,015
RESEARCH$2,750
Paid to
Goodwin Simon Strategic Research, Inc.$36,856
Political Data Intelligence, Inc.$5,015
SL Research LLC$2,750
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$44,3967.6%
Filed as
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$40,156
FOOD FOR EVENT$1,156
FOOD/BEVERAGES FOR EVENT$819
FUNDRAISER - FOOD - 12/16/2025 EVENT$650
FUNDRAISER - PARKING - 12/16/2025 EVENT$620
CATERING$316
EVENT FOOD/BEVERAGES$269
EVENT FOOD/BEVERAGES, AIRFARE,$210
FUNDRAISER - BEVERAGES - 12/16/2025 EVENT$139
EVENT FOOD/BEVERAGES, WEBSITE SERVICES$61
Paid to
Buchert Development LLC$40,156
Manny's$1,819
Cuevas, Samuel$650
Luxury Valet & Shuttle$620
Buchert, Genelle$427
Lola's Mexican Cuisine$316
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$26,8744.6%
Filed as
PROCESSING FEES$21,159
TECH FEE$3,975
FILING FEE$1,740
Paid to
ActBlue$21,159
The Trade Desk$3,975
Secretary of State$1,740
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$14,7792.5%
Filed as
DIGITAL BUY$14,475
No description filed$304
Paid to
Meta Platforms, Inc.$9,375
Hulu$5,100
Buchert, Genelle$304
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$14,3002.5%
Filed as
PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES$14,300
Paid to
Meeno, Inc.$14,300
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$12,7252.2%
Filed as
WEBSITE SERVICES$12,725
Paid to
Landslide Digital LLC$12,600
Mailchimp$125
Refunds and redesignationsContributions returned to donors or reassigned to another election.$1,8500.3%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION REFUND TO COMMITTEE$1,500
RETURNED CONTRIBUTION$350
Paid to
Napolitano for Congress$1,500
Knox, Tom$350
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$388<0.1%
Filed as
AIRFARE$388
Paid to
Southwest Airlines$388
Total itemized disbursements $580,443
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 99 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
7 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $23,603 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.