Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › IN-05 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, IN-05
Representative since 2021
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
9 priorities from spartzforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Our constitutional republic was created with limited government functions to protect the individual rights to Life, Liberty and Property. We must preserve our 2nd Amendment freedoms against the tyranny of the government, and protect the sanctity of all human life.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · spartzforcongress.com/issues
Our national debt is unsustainable. We must cut spending, reform welfare to empower, not suppress low income individuals, and balance the budget. The debt can be tackled, not by raising taxes on US citizens, but by taking a critical look at the unnecessary spending of the federal government.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · spartzforcongress.com/issues
As someone who has personally gone through our immigration system, I know firsthand that we need to make changes. The process takes too long and is too expensive and bureaucratic for those seeking the American dream. If we want to curb illegal immigration, we need to address our legal immigration process to better serve our national interest and have a more robust work visa program.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · spartzforcongress.com/issues
A fundamental function of the federal government is the protection of its people. A strong national defense is key to maintaining that protection. We must keep our military strong and provide better services to our veterans.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · spartzforcongress.com/issues
Our healthcare costs are unsustainable and destroying the middle class. We have to increase transparency and competition, allow more consumer choice and more innovative value-based, not volume-based, health care delivery models. We passed some great legislation in Indiana last legislative session benefiting the consumer, but we still have a lot of work to do and most of it has to be done at the federal level.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · spartzforcongress.com/issues
As a mother and educator, I understand that knowledge is an ultimate equalizer and quality education for our children has always been my top priority. Our post-secondary education has a lot of work to do. Above all, we need to align the cost of education with the earning potential of a career in that field and provide more workforce development opportunities. We must give flexibility to the states to improve K-12 education, reform higher education financing to improve accountability of colleges and better prepare our students to the future workforce demands.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · spartzforcongress.com/issues
Our laws are convoluted and cumbersome. We must audit the government and simplify the code to provide more transparency. We passed laws to improve government efficiency in Indiana. In Congress, I will work to cut back the bureaucratic red tape and make it easier for the American people to hold their government accountable.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · spartzforcongress.com/issues
Free enterprise is the foundation of our country. We must limit regulation powers of the executive branch and maintain a vibrant business environment, so all businesses, no matter their size, can thrive.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · spartzforcongress.com/issues
Politics was never meant to be a career, but a duty to society.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · spartzforcongress.com/issues
93% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 43 times in the 119th Congress.
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Spartz’s 43 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00737767
88¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1.9M of $2.2M). Cash on hand went from $119.7K on Mar 31, 2025 to $514.9K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $156,607 | $294,928 | $119,729 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $265,286 | $321,891 | $63,124 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $321,218 | $190,335 | $194,006 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $269,769 | $254,263 | $209,512 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $66,978 | $210,173 | $66,316 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 15, 2026 | $5,647 | $15,995 | $55,968 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $241,724 | $67,688 | $230,004 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $751,397 | $127,058 | $854,343 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $114,092 | $453,514 | $514,922 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
5 endorsers listed on Victoria Spartz’s own campaign site.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 33,686 votes (60%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Lost · 125,870 votes (48%) · 2 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · Quantus Insights, Oct 22, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,656 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $982K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 64 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $201.3K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 9 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $104.9K.
Total reported receipts $2,192,717
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
45% of the money placed by state came from inside Indiana: $449.1K of $989K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 638 contributions · 45% | $449,096 |
| 107 contributions · 9.8% | $96,513 |
| 195 contributions · 7.5% | $74,437 |
| 213 contributions · 3.8% | $37,281 |
| 81 contributions · 3.4% | $33,821 |
| 122 contributions · 3.2% | $31,560 |
| 56 contributions · 2.8% | $27,415 |
| 4 contributions · 2.5% | $24,600 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 52 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 161 contributions · 9.7% of ranked | $49,450 |
| 17 contributions · 9.2% of ranked | $47,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 105 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $23,673 |
| 3 contributions · 3% of ranked | $15,500 |
| 4 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 4 contributions · 2% of ranked | $10,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 9 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $9,600 |
A further $483,465 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($476,100) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Spartz’s campaign or spending on ads about Spartz are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 47% to named individuals, 39% to organizations, 10% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 3.1% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Executive Chairman, Ripple Inc. · behind Invest in Tomorrow Coalition PAC | $932.1K |
| Organization · behind Invest in Tomorrow Coalition PAC | $776.7K |
| Organization · behind Commonsense Hoosiers PAC | $199.2K |
| Person · Executive, Bloomberg LP · behind Invest in Tomorrow Coalition PAC and HMP | $177.5K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Commonsense Hoosiers PAC | $172.1K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind HMP | $107K |
| Person · CEO, Uline · behind Restoration of America PAC | $96.6K |
| Organization · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. | $96K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Commonsense Hoosiers PAC | $91.3K |
| Organization · behind Commonsense Hoosiers PAC | $89.3K |
| Person · Partner, Greylock Partners · behind Commonsense Hoosiers PAC and HMP | $82.5K |
| Person · Chairman, Hendricks Holding Co Inc. · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. | $82.3K |
Read for the 9 largest groups of 11, 87% of the $5.4M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $21,500 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $1,388,291
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 663 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
28 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $84,548 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 30 payments · 26% of all spending | $506,658 |
| 3 payments · 20% of all spending | $386,192 |
| 22 payments · 4.9% of all spending | $93,963 |
| 2 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $59,071 |
| 2 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $47,500 |
| 21 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $43,272 |
| 11 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $33,145 |
| 5 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $22,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,786 contributions · 37% of ranked | $315,585 |
| 38 contributions · 7.5% of ranked | $63,045 |
| 25 contributions · 6.2% of ranked | $52,100 |
| 41 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $31,900 |
| 11 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $29,300 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 23 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $28,610 |
| 23 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $27,155 |
| 18 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $22,175 |
A further $151,124 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($476,100) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.